Developing a visually striking WordPress website should not feel like a headache or solving complex code. Elementor, Gutenberg, and Divi help you design your dream website without writing a single line of code. Now the real question is: which website builder suits you best?
This blog will ultimately help you identify a WordPress page builder that best matches your working style, preferences, and necessary features. Each one’s capabilities will be compared to determine that. We will also show how WordPress managed hosting would make for a simpler page-building process and important parameters on which you’d need to decide WordPress host pricing.
Are you ready to jump right in?
A Quick Introduction to Gutenberg, Elementor, and Divi WordPress Page Builders
WordPress comes with multiple powerful page builders, each with its strengths. First, there is Gutenberg, a standard block editor that defines a clean and easy way to structure content. Another drag-drop-adaptable page builder is Elementor, which offers the best flexibility with designs to the extent that one doesn’t need to know the code. Third, Divi, which is heavily known for its visual editor and preset layouts, offers options for in-depth customization with a streamlined workflow. Whether you decide to use a Native editor or an advanced design tool, the selection depends upon your needs. Let’s analyze their features and see which page builder fits your website best!
Gutenberg vs Elementor vs Divi Builder: A Full Comparison
Well, we have introduced the block editor, i.e., Gutenberg. Similarly, it is time to introduce the two more tools we will be looking into, i.e., Elementor and Divi.
First things first, Elementor has long remained the primary page builder for WordPress. It provides a broad spectrum of elements and templates for content building. Its free version allows you to design pages and posts by using the drag and drop. An upgrade to the premium version would set you up for the use of Elementor’s optional built-in hosting plan. This means that you do not have to worry about finding a hosting provider because Elementor is there for your service. Exploring our complete WordPress Elementor plugin review will help you to know more about it.
Likewise, the Divi Builder hasn’t stopped being popular among WordPress users for ages.
Apart from that, Divi has a vast library of elements and limitless customization options, along with an almost unlimited ability to design just about any layout. Unfortunately, there isn’t any free version; it’s available for yearly access at the $89.00 membership to Elegant Themes.
Unique Features
To begin with, let’s check out the core features of each platform:
Gutenberg Block Editor
Here’s how you can use the Gutenberg block editor:
- It allows users to create pages, posts, and their own custom content types using a drag-and-drop editor.
- Create entirely different content with blocks along with essentials like text and images but beyond that, users can use additional options such as tables and buttons. With extension plugins like Otter Blocks, these blocks can be expanded.
- Customize a few options for each block and a few extensively documented settings. There are more options for customization through block extension plugins or using a specific block-based theme with FSE capability.
- Allows unlimited rearrangement of blocks, plus adding and deleting a block whenever necessary.
- Create multi-column layouts.
Overall, drag-and-drop is a functional block editor. These standard features are most common in page builder plugins. Hence the focus will mainly be on what is unique in Gutenberg vs Elementor vs Divi Builder.
Elementor
With Elementor, you will get things like:
- An optional all-in-one solution that includes hosting, so you will not have to find a hosting company.
- Access to more than 40 various types of “widgets” (similar to blocks of Gutenberg) in the free version and up to more than 100 such widgets in the premium option.
- A library of page and section templates you can apply.
- Capable of creating certain layouts unique to Elementor.
- More advanced styling options for each widget and section.
- More advanced features like maps, image carousels, and accordion tabs (the premium one also offers forums, slides, price lists, etc.).
- Premium option allows the creation of headers, footers, and sections of the website.
Divi
Curious to know about Divi? With the help of this page builder, you can:
- Use 200+ customizable “modules” (resembling the blocks in Gutenberg) to create your content.
- Incorporate advanced features like portfolios, testimonials, maps, forms, counters, and so much more.
- Users can build complicated layouts with the help of several columns and even mix full-width and multi-column rows.
- Add custom margins and padding to adjust spacing.
- Save designs for later reuse with ease.
- Use a ton of style controls to adjust the appearance of modules.
As you can tell, some of the things that Elementor and Divi win over compared to the default Gutenberg block editor are things like columns, spacing, and style controls.
Conclusion
So now we come to the million-dollar question: which editor should you use?
If you have never used a page builder before or have just started with WordPress, then the best of the three above is Gutenberg. It is easy to understand and use, and as tests have shown, it’s going to load your website faster compared to either Elementor or Divi.
Moreover, the Gutenberg editor has come a long way, and it’s also effortless to extend its functionality using a block-based theme or free plugin. Then, if you are already using Divi or Elementor to work on your website, that doesn’t mean you have to stop. You can also use them together with the Gutenberg block editor, so it is not necessarily an either/or situation.
You can try the ground with some posts using the Gutenberg block editor and then switch to the Elementor or Divi Builder once you feel that the outcome can be achieved better through those plugins. Experiment and find a solution that works best for you—whether that means otherwise using one of these tools solely or relying on a more hybrid approach.